Welcome! This blog contains research & information on lifestyle, nutrition and health for those with MS, as well as continuing information on the understanding of the endothelium and heart-brain connection. This blog is informative only--all medical decisions should be discussed with your own physicians.

The posts are searchable---simply type in your topic of interest in the search box at the top left.

Almost all of MS research is initiated and funded by pharmaceutical companies. This maintains the EAE mouse model and the auto-immune paradigm of MS, and continues the 20 billion dollar a year MS treatment industry. But as we learn more about slowed blood flow, gray matter atrophy, and environmental links to MS progression and disability--all things the current drugs do not address--we're discovering more about how to help those with MS.

To learn how this journey began, read my first post from August, 2009. Be well! Joan

Tuesday, August 2, 2022

Fabricated Alzheimer's research scandal

Two weeks ago, a scandal blew up the world of Alzheimer's disease research.  

Thanks to an investigative report at Science, it was revealed that slides of beta amyloid plaques attached to a 2006 research paper were enhanced and research fabricated, affecting a decade's worth of research and failed drug development, and undue agony for Alzheimer's patients and families.  I suggest reading this report, for all of the gory details.  
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease


How could this happen?  Was it simply the pressures of academia to publish or perish?  Or pressures from pharmaceutical companies who fund research to find a profitable drug solution?  Could it be a myopic understanding of specific protein build up in the brain, without consideration of the underlying processes behind inflammation, slowed cerebral perfusion and drainage?  Was it due to the credo of neuroimmunologists which focuses on the trees, rather than the forest?  I would posit it is all of the above.

Readers of this blog know that I have written about the importance of understanding a systems approach to healing in diseases of neurodegeneration, including MS.  But a systems approach will never be one drug, pill, or infusion.  A systems approach can never be placebo trialled.  It will never make money for researchers of big pharma, so they won't fund studies.  And this is a problem.

In 2014, I  talked to ISNVD keynote speaker Dr. Paula Grammas regarding her Alzheimer's Disease research, which was focused on the multi-factorial causes of Alzheimer's related to vascular inflammation.  

Below, I'll copy and paste a 2014 post on this topic, including the groundbreaking Alzheimer's research of Dr. Dale Bredesen. Dr. Bredesen had been concerned that a billion dollars of Alzheimer's research money was going to understanding beta amyloid plaques as a target for drug development.  Turns out, he had a lot of reason for his concern.  



Published in the September issue of Aging, "Reversal of cognitive decline: A novel therapeutic program", a new study at UCLA shows exactly how a personalized "Systems Approach" helped Alzheimer's patients recover memory and health.

Dr. Dale Bredesen, Professor of Neurology at UCLA, authored the new paper.  Dr. Bredesen is one of many researchers who has questioned the pharmaceutical model of inhibiting beta amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's.  


In the case of Alzheimer's disease, Bredesen notes, there is not one drug that has been developed that stops or even slows the disease's progression, and drugs have only had modest effects on symptoms. "In the past decade alone, hundreds of clinical trials have been conducted for Alzheimer's at an aggregate cost of over a billion dollars, without success," he said.

The model of multiple targets and an imbalance in signaling runs contrary to the popular dogmathat Alzheimer's is a disease of toxicity, caused by the accumulation of sticky plaques in the brain. Bredesen believes the amyloid beta peptide, the source of the plaques, has a normal function in the brain -- as part of a larger set of molecules that promotes signals that cause nerve connections to lapse. Thus the increase in the peptide that occurs in Alzheimer's disease shifts the memory-making vs. memory-breaking balance in favor of memory loss.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140930143446.htm?utm_source=feedburner

Dr. Bredesen believed that using a multiple target lifestyle therapy with his Alzheimer's patients might improve brain signaling.  Here are the main features of the program he created, which was adjusted for each individual patient.

(1) eliminating all simple carbohydrates (breads, pastas, baked goods)
(2) eliminating gluten and processed food, with increased vegetables, fruits, and non-farmed fish
(3) reducing stress with yoga
(4) as a second measure to reduce the stress, meditation for 20 minutes twice per day
(5) melatonin each night
(6) increasing sleep from 4-5 hours per night to 7-8 hours per night
(7) methylcobalamin (vitamin B12)
(8) vitamin D3
(9) omega 3 fish oil
(10) CoQ10 
(11) Exercising for a minimum of 30 minutes, 4-6 days per week.

(Long time readers of this blog will notice that this program shares a lot with the Endothelial Health Program)
http://ccsvi.org/index.php/helping-myself/endothelial-health

The results for 9 patients was better overall health, better body mass index, and a reversal of memory loss.   That's Alzheimer's Disease reversal!   Something no one drug has been able to achieve.

I've written about the difficulty in conducting double-blind, placebo control trials for lifestyle.   As Dr. Roy Swank, Dr. George Jelinek and Dr. Terry Wahls could all attest,  the "gold standard" trial approach works best for drugs. But that doesn't mean a holistic approach to healing is invalid, or cannot be trialled.  It just means it takes more work for both patient and researcher.  

There is no way to patent or monetize a new lifestyle, so drug companies won't be paying for these studies.   However, a holistic approach addresses many different aspects of health.

Yes, this is a small study, and yes, it is still anecdotal evidence.  But this program can be used in clinical trials.  It will be costly, and take time---but it may save brains.

What does this Alzheimer's research have to do with MS?  When we consider the link of the heart to the brain and the importance of cardiovascular health to cerebral perfusion, we can understand the need for endothelial health.  An oxygenated, perfused, cleansed and fed brain is a happy and healthy brain.

All diseases of neurodegeneration share hypoperfusion, or simply, reduced cerebral blood flow.  

There are lifestyle changes that can be made to aid healing.  Please note that I did not use the word "cure."  For more on how the "cure mentality" can hamper our efforts to heal--read 

The era of a "brain in isolation" research is ending.  More and more researchers, like Dr. Bredesen, are considering the body as a whole unit, and addressing cardiovascular function in brain health.

Thanks to Dr. Bredesen and UCLA for going up against the pharmaceutical companies, and bringing hope and healing to his Alzheimer's patients. 

Where are the MS specialists ready to take on this challenge?
We're waiting,
Joan

Tuesday, July 5, 2022

Guardians of the Brain

A recent paper in Nature explains how the brain's newly discovered immune system protects our gray matter.  https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-01502-8

For those who have followed this blog over the past 15 years, you might remember my posts on the ground breaking work of Dr. Michal Schwartz.  It is thanks to her pushing back against the status quo and the work of her student, Dr. Jony Kipnis, that we now understand the importance of immune cells in the brain.  Neuroimmunology is a growing field, and has changed all we thought we knew about the central nervous system.

In 2002, Dr. Schwartz published a new paradigm for MS treatment with her then-student, Dr. Jony Kipnis.  They were concerned that MS treatments which suppressed or ablated the brain's immune cells would eventually be harmful to the brain.  Even though inflammation might be tamped down in the short term, the brain would atrophy, or lose volume, without its protective immune system.  She suggested modulating immune cells, and boosting the brain's immune response, rather than getting rid of it, which made sense to me.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12374425/

Jeff recently had a new MRI.  It's been 15 years since his MS diagnosis, and we are thankful to report that his gray matter is "normal and healthy" with no loss.  He has no new white matter lesions and he's still biking, hiking, jogging and working.  We are very thankful for his mild course in this disease, and thankful he was treated for stenotic jugular veins and dural sinus.  He was fortunate to be able to stay active and adapt a new lifestyle. 

I no longer share my opinions or advice on MS treatments on the internet, as I felt it was not my place as a lay person to give medical advice.  But I will continue to share the science.  

Please follow the ISNVD for further publications and research on the vascular connection to diseases of neurodegeneration.   https://isnvd.org

As the venous dural sinus in the place where the brain's immune system connects to the vasculature, neuroimmunologists will be exploring this further. 


stay well!   

Joan



Sunday, January 23, 2022

Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and MS

The association of the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and multiple sclerosis is one that has evolved over of decades of research.  95% of all humans carry the dormant or "latent" EBV virus.  But in people with MS, there is an activation of the virus, which is seen in tissue of autopsied brains. 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2118531/ 

I wrote about this connection exactly 10 years ago.  https://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2012/01/hypoxia-reactivates-latent-ebv-january.html

EBV is in the news a decade later, because researchers at Harvard have a new study published in Science  https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abj8222

Their conjecture is that if people are never infected with EBV, they will never develop MS.  Well, that would be wonderful!  Incredible.  An end to MS.  An EBV vaccine will be developed, and it may well help future generations.  But what about the people alive today on the planet, the 95% of us who are already infected with EBV?  

Back in 2011, researchers at Buffalo Neuroimmaging Analysis Center published a paper in Expert Reviews on how venous stasis (or impeded blood flow out of the brain) might be responsible for a reactivation of EBV.  This paper no longer exists online, which is heart-breaking to me.  The only place I found links to this hypothesis was in my writing.  

But I would like to suggest that this be further explored. 

The association between EBV infection and CCSVI has not yet been explored; however, it could be hypothesized that venous stasis in the superior saggital sinus due to extracranial outflow impairment could affect the drainage of bridging veins that pass through the subarachnoid space (near the meninges and EBV-infected B-cell follicles) and contribute to EBV activation. The venous stasis hypothesis in the SSS may contribute to understanding why so many different viruses and bacteria [3,111] have been linked to increased MS susceptibility risk over the last 50 years.

I have stopped following MS research and writing about it for many reasons.  Jeff continues to do quite well, and I am not the person to be giving out medical advice.  

Follow the ISNVD.  Listen to experts.  Take care of yourselves. 
Be well,
Joan