Thursday, January 21, 2016

HSCT-- Facts behind the Headlines

Whenever there is a news story on autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT), I hear about it.  Perhaps this also happens to you, MS patients and caregivers?  Well-meaning friends, family, and acquaintances forward you links to glowing miracle cure stories.  And I reply with sincere thanks--and also inform them that Jeff's doing really well, with no MS disability, inflammation, new lesions or disease progression, now 9 years past his diagnosis with MS.  So, HSCT is really not for him.  Believe me--I know how fortunate we are to be able to report that!

Here's the latest miracle cure HSCT story out of Sheffield Teaching Hospital in the UK, which was picked up on British television and the press.  It's received a lot of coverage after the BBC aired a report:
http://www.bbc.com/news/health-35065905


For those who have had MS awhile now, these repeated stories on HSCT are heartening, but at the same time discouraging.  Because HSCT is certainly not for everyone, and many can't even consider this treatment.  It is good to know that some people are getting relief from MS and recovering their abilities.  It's also very important to understand that these stories are anecdotal.  They are heart warming, for sure, I'm not trying to be a downer.  But there is a dark side to this "cure narrative" I'd like to explore:  the premise that a "faulty immune system" in MS which needs to be ablated and completely removed is keeping us from understanding true disease progression.  

The general public, press, and politicians get a false sense of progress when they read these news stories.  They think, "well, at least we've got multiple sclerosis cured"....when nothing could be farther from the truth.  And new and recently diagnosed MS patients, who have yet to have gone through a decade of these kinds of stories, may mistakenly believe this is a cure.

HSCT was developed for pediatric cancer, and has been a blessing for the children and their families who have seem mortality rates decrease and life expectancy increase.  In this instance, carpet bombing the body and killing off cancer cells and then rebuilding the immune system with harvested and purified stem cells has saved lives. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/989518-overview

In MS, HSCT use was first promoted by Dr. Richard Burt in the 1990s and has been used to treat thousands with MS.  However, there have been no randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trials, so even after all this time, results are still not considered "gold standard."  In fact, some of the results may be placebo.  The stronger or more invasive the proposed treatment, the more powerful the placebo effect.   https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sideways-view/201502/the-placebo-effect

Here are the facts:

1.  HSCT is only appropriate for those with highly inflammatory relapsing remitting MS, who have not responded to other drug therapies, and who have new lesions and relapses within the past year.  Trial participants cannot have had MS for longer than 10 years and cannot be too disabled.  This is a very small and specific group of people with MS.
A systematic literature search identified a higher efficacy of aHSCT in younger, less disabled MS patients with inflammatory activity, similar to the findings from Hamburg.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956824

2.  HSCT uses chemotherapy to wipe out the existing immune system.  Many researchers urge caution regarding this approach, because chemotherapy--on its own-- is known to have many deadly side effects, causing up to 5% mortality in some trials.  Chemotherapy also causes demyelination and brain atrophy.  I've written extensively on the long term neurological effects of chemotherapy here:  http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2014/03/chemotherapy-causes-brain-atrophy.html

3.  Long-term success rates show that MS disability is not halted.  HSCT is not a cure.  It may be a very helpful treatment for some with highly inflammatory MS, however the disease continues to progress in most patients.  And autoreactive T cells to myelin targets return.

Our data parallel results from some of the clinical phase I/II studies showing continued clinical disease progression in multiple sclerosis patients with high expanded disability system scores despite autologous stem cell transplantation.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17293360

Demyelinating and inflammatory activities of MS persisted after allo-HSCT in all of the patients with MS. Active and chronic active MS lesions exhibited significantly higher numbers of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and significantly higher scores of CD68+ microglia/macrophages than did chronic inactive lesions or normal-appearing white matter.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20558390

Re-emergence as well as in vivo expansion of autoreactive T cells to multiple myelin targets was evident in all patients studied. The reconstituted myelin-specific T cells exhibited the same Th1 and Th2 responses as preablation myelin-reactive T cells. In contrast, the post-therapy T-cell repertoire exhibited a significantly diminished capacity for Th17 responses.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23463494


And now, the big question.  Why do autoreactive T cells return even after they've been blasted to kingdom come and replaced with a new immune system?  Why does MS continue to progress?
Could it be that the underlying cause of the activation of these t cells is not a faulty immune system---but rather a continuing process of neurodegeneration?

The kind of neurodegenerative process we see happening in the gray matter structures of the MS brain?  The type of neurodegeneration that shows continued atrophy of the thalamus in all people with MS---from CIS to PPMS?  http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2016/01/thalamic-atrophy-and-ms-progression.html

A major pathological complication of auto-HSCT may be the effects reported on brain volume.  Rapid loss of brain volume has been measured a few months after treatment []. Auto-HSCT has seemingly detrimental effects on the integrity of the brain tissue that leads to rapid loss of about 1.92 % of brain volume.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715306/


There is a huge difference between finding MS treatments which give patients relief from their symptoms and reduction in disability for a year or two-----and understanding the underlying disease mechanism which allows for continued MS progression.  Temporarily tamping down inflammation is not the same as halting MS disease progression.  

Keep getting the correct info out there.  Push for researchers and policy makers to examine the underlying cause of MS disease progression.  
That's the only way forward,

Joan






This is about the use of bone marrow stem cells to to replace the immune system and is the most extreme form of "induction therapy" aimed at rebooting the immune system. This study has been reported by us and it is clear that the majority of people are not leaping out of their wheel chairs. This is just the type of poor reporting that the media specialise in ...media hype

PICTURE CREDIT:  TOM SCOTT---Journalism Warning Labels







14 comments:

  1. Thank God I have always been healthy except this thing ... MS/ Vascular condition. I do not want my immune system compromised and reading your blog will help explain to people who get so excited about the hype. This is the main reason I do not like discussing anything HSCT. I just wish these researchers would concentrate on what the cause of MS is instead of subjecting us to this procedure or their dangerous drugs. I have always said ... since when is MS Cancer? Thank you as always Joan for this and explaining it so well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You truly do not understand HSCT my friend. Bedridden patients returning to work. I could go on for hours with videos personal blogs JAMA medical reports. Drugs and this CCSVI are fruitless attempts to reset the immune system.
      DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THE DRUG COMPANIES they do not want to lose PAYING CUSTOMERS:
      http://www.stemcell-immunotherapy.com/pub_vid.html

      Delete
  2. After personally experiencing and seeing the results of over 600 people have seen positive results. SO up to 14 years of remission is not long enough to convince you who wish to cause doubt in peoples minds. 600 successes in Chicago for RRMS plus hundreds more for the 19 other autoimmune conditions. Add in another 600+ in Moscow. Dozens from USA alone in the recent Mexico facility. Hundreds in Brazil. Germany, Italy. Naysayers be damn this is coming to reality big drug companies and their lies will not stop this or disprove the fact people are leaping from their wheelchairs. People going back to work who arose from their chairs. You want unproven procedures check the facts on CCSVI.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It honestly breaks my heart to see people give hard earned money and get false hope. HSCT is real! NOTHING works like it does.
      https://youtu.be/J7B2KQIyrZA

      Delete
    2. aminfla, you might as well go away. There will not be one person here who will believe what you write about CCSVI.

      Delete
    3. Their money and their loss. Their decision!

      Delete
  4. aminfla ,If you saying that CCSVI is a scam, how can you explain about the visible blockages in the vains and if HSCT really works maybe they should push for some clinical studies to keep everyone quite and have real data.

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://www.stemcell-immunotherapy.com/pdfs/lancetMS2009.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/zamboni-ms-vein-theory-debunked-by-study-1.1930041

    ReplyDelete
  7. To aminfla, and all HSCT proponents who have suddenly discovered this six year old blog page, I would hope that anyone reading this posting would understand that I am commenting on the actual, peer-reviewed science of HSCT (as compared to the miracle headline pronouncements or anecdotal stories.)

    Certainly, if people with highly inflammatory RRMS are finding relief in this treatment, that is a very good thing!!! I am also concerned with the narrative of the autoimmune theory, which gets all of the research money and attention, while very real vascular connections to the MS disease process are underfunded and ignored.

    The International Society for Neurovascular Disease (ISNVD) will be meeting at the Academy of Sciences, and more research will be presented there. Here is a data base for peer-reviewed science on the vascular connections to MS, including the newly discovered lymphatic draining vessels of the brain, which rely on the veins. This research is underfunded, but certainly important, as the century old belief of the brain's immune privilege was overturned in the past year. The brain needs immune cells---ablating them completely may not be the best idea. http://ccsvi.org/index.php/component/search/index.php?option=com_search&task=search

    ReplyDelete
  8. It is interesting that I have had people have contacted me about HSCT. Ignored their doctors ignorance tried the ccsvi(very temporary results)and have since gone to some of the locations that are available and now have been very happy with the reality of HSCT. Mission accomplished lives restores. God bless you and the path you have chosen.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Joan,
    First of all thanks for taking the time to produce the website. I've read many interesting things. I'm curious where are these HSCT facts quoted below from?

    "causing up to 5% mortality in some trials."
    I see the modern studies say .3%

    and "Long-term success rates show that MS disability is not halted"
    I've read 80% non-progression of disease


    I'm in the discovery phase of all treatments. Since this page is getting traffic its seems its should be kept up to date whatever the studies show. Or at least say as such and point people somewhere to get current facts. I'm seeing everything as 2 year old entries.

    Thanks,
    Dan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Local--
      Wishing you the best in your search for effective treatments.
      "Estimates of the fatality rate range up to 5% worldwide." https://www.nationalmssociety.org/NationalMSSociety/media/MSNationalFiles/Research/FAQ-About-HSCT.pdf

      As far as long term success rates--auto reactive t cells return after treatment. Which begs the quesiton, what does non-progression of disease mean? Does this include gray matter/thalamic atrophy, or is it simply referring to white matter lesions? Long term success, to me, would mean no loss of gray matter, not just cessation of relapses. My husband has had a reversal of gray matter atrophy, as well as remyelination of lesions, now 11 years out from diagnosis. He has had no disability progression. Until we deal with the neurodegenerative aspect of MS, or the loss of gray matter, we really can't understand disease progression. Here's more on why your gray matter matters. all best, Joan http://ccsviinms.blogspot.com/2016/01/thalamic-atrophy-and-ms-progression.html

      Delete